World Cup Vs Super Bowl By The Numbers: Viewers, Revenue, Ratings

Sure, we're biased, but let's make it official. The World Cup is better than the Super Bowl.

In 2018 the USMNT was left out of the most-watched sporting event in the world. The football vs futbol and World Cup vs Super Bowl debates are made in vain. Although the NFL and the Super Bowl continue to hold the top ratings spot in the U.S., overall World Cup viewership dwarfs that of American football.

During the 2018 World Cup final in Russia, more than one billion people tuned in to see France knock off Croatia. Of those viewers, 516.6 million watched at least 20 consecutive minutes.

Embed from Getty Images

By comparison, the most-watched Super Bowl was the 2015 match up between the New England Patriots and Seattle Seahawks. That game drew 114.4 million viewers in the U.S., and an estimated 30-50 million internationally

Simply put, the Super Bowl does not have the international viewership that the World Cup commands.

World Cup vs Super Bowl Viewership

World Cup vs Super Bowl Viewership

The 2019 Super Bowl between the Patriots and the Los Angeles Rams was the least-watched Super Bowl since 2008. Its 98.2 million viewers in the U.S. was below the 105 million Americans who watched 20 minutes of at least one game from the 2014 World Cup. 

World Cup vs Super Bowl Revenue

The massive viewership numbers of the World Cup and Super Bowl pad the coffers of FIFA and the NFL respectively.

FIFA has turned a profit of $5 billion or just below from the last three World Cups. The TV rights for the 2014 World Cup ($2.43 billion) exceeded all of FIFA's expenditures ($2.22 billion) for the tournament in Brazil.

World Cup vs Super Bowl Revenue

The Super Bowl accounts for an estimated $620 million of the NFL's revenue. That number helps make the NFL the leading revenue generator among all professional sports leagues, having surpassed $14 billion during the 2017 season.

Although the World Cup lasts just a month and features 64 games, its 2018 revenue eclipsed $5 billion.

So, where does the money go? In 2014 Germany's national team received $35 million from FIFA in exchange for winning the World Cup in 2014. That $35 million was considered a cost for FIFA, so it did not come out of its $2.6 billion profit from the tournament. 

Each of the 23 German players on the roster received $408,000 for winning. That means that the German Football Association kept $25 million of FIFA's money to allocate beyond paying its players.

In 2018, France was awarded $38 million out of a $400 million purse for winning the World Cup.

Embed from Getty Images

The World Cup winners' haul looks handsome compared to the $118,000 each member of the Patriots' Super Bowl-winning team received from the NFL in 2019. Rams players took in half of that sum at $59,000 apiece. Each NFL team has a 53-man roster, but a few extra players earn that bonus by being on the roster for at least half of a team's games. 

Still, the projected total player winnings of $10 million from the Super Bowl accounts for less than two percent of the revenue the game generates for the NFL.

When it comes down to the international TV audience, revenue generated per game and even the pay that winning players receive, the World Cup vs Super Bowl debate has a clear winner. The World Cup is top dog. 

Videos you might like